home mail us syndication

“Lucky” is “finished”


… and I am, shall we say, “dissatisfied” with the results*.

Figure 152: Believe it or not, I have photos where I look worse.

I’d planned this to have zero ease, but that didn’t happen very much. Except in the sleeves.

Finished Lucky v1.0 had an extended side tie. Pardon the flamenco-poses here, but I am trying to show the amount of RAW UNADULTERATED CINCH required to tie this sweater on. Also, I’ve always found surplice-style garments a bit touchy, because you have to hit the waist just right to avoid the bottom hems diagonalizing themselves weirdly; just right did not happen here.

Figure 153: There are letters here

To correct this, I ditched the tie, added buttonholes, overlapped the two fronts more to narrow the sweater. It looked really acceptable! for three hours. Then it grew.

Figure 154: Why yes, I am strong to the finish.The problem, incidentally, was not really with the pattern drafting. There are a number of predictable-in-hindsight factors contributing to the big fat ‘meh’ that is this sweater:

1) Yarn sprawl. Heck, I’m not totally sure that I even knit this quite to gauge.
2) In the year it took me to knit this, I changed shape.
3) I have a longstanding suspicion that most knitters design for a person with vastly different proportions than I have (ref. fig 154).

I’m sort of kicking myself, because if I’d just converted the pattern to top-down raglan, knitted the sleeves simultaneously at the right proportions, and tried on as I went, I’d probably have a sweater that was only slightly too large and was the same nice proportionate too-large all around. It would fit my shoulders better, too. Kids, if you do not live in a pineapple under the sea, learn to make a top-down raglan in your size and shape. You can fake pretty much anything you want as a top-down raglan.

I don’t know whether to unravel this and fix it, or just cry into it.

Anyway, here is the Ravelry link to the project, but I’m not yet updating the entry until I get a decent photo showing that this sweater looks nearly acceptable if left unbuttoned.



*I need to clarify that my hair looks that way because it is wet. I did not dunk it in olive oil before posing for this picture.

Joanna said,

July 31, 2008 @ 1:42 pm

I think I’m going to rip mine out. Not because of this but because… I didn’t do the shaping in the back right and probably shouldn’t just wing it.

This makes me sad :( But your post made me laugh and after all Lucky was how I first came to know you.

Lynn in Tucson said,

July 31, 2008 @ 10:28 pm

Wow. Heartbreaking. That is an otherwise very pretty sweater.

Do you have an evil twin? You two could share it….

Alli said,

August 1, 2008 @ 4:47 pm

Sorry to hear about/see your sweater woes. Your post is very funny but it still sucks when sweaters don’t come out the way you hope they will. Do you think you will still wear it as is? I can’t tell from the pictures if it is still suitably flattering. Also: Why are the arms in sweaters always too tight? Or maybe why do I have Popeye arms? I -always- have to supersize arm circumferences for my 13″ pythons.

Thalia said,

August 11, 2008 @ 8:04 pm

Figure 154, if nothing else, makes me happy.

I share the too-big-knitted-items woes. Woe!

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment